W.

Review, by James Berardinelli: "Superficial, uninformative, and inert, this two hour snoozefest isn't even inflammatory enough to stoke a righteous anti-Bush brushfire. W. does for recent history what Oliver Stone's epic "Alexander" did for ancient times." [Rating: 2 out of 4]

Category:

W > W.

Random Site Quote:

Date Added: Apr 29, 2010 Hits: Rating: 0.00 Votes: 0

Member Reviews

Visitor Ratings

Google PR

2. Time: W.

Review, by Richard Corliss: "The movie is an X-ray of an invisible man -- by the film's end, the W. still stands for Who?"

Category:

W > W.

Random Site Quote:

Date Added: Apr 29, 2010 Hits: Rating: 0.00 Votes: 0

Member Reviews

Visitor Ratings

Google PR

3. The Christian Science Monitor: W.

Review, by Peter Rainer: "Stone may think he's made a movie about the toxicity of the Bush presidency, but what we have instead is a cautionary tale of a decidedly lower order. As far as I can make out, the real message of W. is: Don't vote for anybody who talks with his mouth full of food."

Category:

W > W.

Random Site Quote:

Date Added: Apr 29, 2010 Hits: Rating: 0.00 Votes: 0

Member Reviews

Visitor Ratings

Google PR

4. RogerEbert.com: W.

Review, by Roger Ebert: "W., a biography of President Bush, is fascinating. No other word for it." [Rating: 4 out of 4]

Category:

W > W.

Random Site Quote:

Date Added: Apr 29, 2010 Hits: Rating: 0.00 Votes: 0

Member Reviews

Visitor Ratings

Google PR

5. IGN: W.